El dia de la Bastilla en Yiddish

 

Posted in "Terrorism", Media by earthlinggb on July 17, 2016

Ok, it’s been a LONG time since I proverbially, put pen to paper but this is just too much to ignore.

It’s short but it’s “sweet”.

The other day, when it happened, I made the following comments somewhere:

This guy seems to be the only one with footage of this truck. This means the media would have to have gotten access to it and to use it from the guy (or woman) who took the footage. Just ONE guy has any (what may or may not be called) decent footage of this truck seemingly “rampaging” through the street.
Wasn’t that lucky of the media that they got hold of this one piece of footage? (The other footage from the crowd for all of about 1 or 2 seconds was hardly useful). This footage has now been shown all across the world probably millions and millions of times. If YOU had taken this footage, what would you have done?
And, again, note how he/she tracks the truck with the camera.

Now, it was not the above video exactly, from RT, which I was commenting on because it didn’t have the name of the videographer added as you can see in the RT footage.

Someone commented to my comments: “I’d make a fortune and never work again.”
To which I replied: “Exactly!” (Media outlets would pay a small ransom for such footage if the only footage available – and it seems to be more or less)
I added: “Why don’t people get wise to all of this man? WHY isn’t it all bloody obvious? WHY don’t they pick up stuff that stares them in the face?

NOW, however, we have the guy’s name – Richard Gutjahr. Richard is a German. HOWEVER, he just so happens to be married to a woman by the name of Einat Wilf.

Who is Einat Wilf?

Son of a BITCH!
Remember I was saying how it was odd that the cameraman/woman (whoever it was) seemed to be focusing and tracking the truck just as it came into view?
Well here’s the guy who took the footage.
Now, the BIG thing is that he is married to Einat Wilf – an Israeli Knesset member AND reported to be MOSSAD Intelligence Agent.
COME ON folks! Get the bloody wax out your ears and the sunglasses off!
These people are ALWAYS in the thick of it! That footage (just like so many others) was taken by just the “right” kind of guy! HOW IGNORANT ARE YOU WILLING TO REMAIN? How much do you really believe in “Coincidence Theory?

Attack witness Richard Gutjahr speaks to DW

http://www.dw.com/en/attack-witness-richard-gutjahr-speaks-to-dw/av-19401774

When you listen to the interview in the above link, listen very closely because there are elements of this guy’s testimony which are VERY telling. Two things in particular:

1. He states that there were fireworks which finished just before the truck turned up but it would appear that he did not take any footage of these even though he had his camera at the ready. He says he did not start any filming until he saw the truck. So, here is a guy who just, luckily, was at the window or on the balcony of his hotel at just the right moment in time to then decide to switch on his camera to take footage of a truck? So, as soon as a truck comes into his field of view he says to himself “That’s odd, I must film this”? He doesn’t film fireworks or any of the other goings on. Also, he just so happens to be on his balcony with a perfect view rather than being down amongst the crowd. Perhaps his Knesset MP, jewish wife is paranoid about crowds and trucks? Further, as he says, “it all happened in a space of 60 seconds”. 60 seconds out of a whole night and he’s there, with his camera at the ready. If it was his phone camera, he’d have to pick it up or retrieve it from his pocket, switch it on to camera setting and start filming. Let’s say that takes even 10 seconds. That means he must have noticed the truck even further back from where he starts filming. Why would he think anything of it to consider it required filming given all the other activity of the night – the good stuff? No. It is very apparent this guy was primed to take this footage. No doubt about it.
2. The interviewer asks a really odd question: “How did you escape?” Escape what? Notice he doesn’t say that however. He goes into some long ramble about being held in the hotel and then goes on to talk about taking pics of police and peace signs etc. But why on earth did this interviewer ask him how he “escaped”? Obviously, he was nowhere bloody near the truck because he was up in his hotel room taking the footage!

But, generally, just listen to this interview. It is packed with the same old verbiage and diarrhoea.
And here’s the wife…

Einat Wilf (Hebrew: עינת וילף‎‎, born 11 December 1970) is an Israeli politician who served as a member of the Knesset for Independence and the Labor Party.
Einat Wilf was born in Jerusalem. She studied at the Hebrew University Secondary School. During her national service in the Israel Defense Forces she was an Intelligence Officer in Unit 8200, and reached the rank of lieutenant. She then went to Harvard University, receiving a BA in government and fine arts, before being awarded an MBA by INSEAD in France, and subsequently a PhD in political science at Wolfson College, University of Cambridge.
Wilf is married to German journalist and television personality Richard Gutjahr. She gave birth to their son in 2010.
Wilf describes herself as a Zionist and an atheist.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Einat_Wilf
And here is a very interesting quote from Einat Wilf:
 

“There is no such thing as ‘fighting fair’ in this war of words and images.”

From “Winning the media war”.

Winning the media war

Now, do you remember a group of Israelis after 9/11 who were allowed to return to Israel, said they were claimed to be Mossad and also stated they had been in New York City to “document the event”?
No?
Here’s a reminder:

Now, for god’s sakes people, wake the hell up!

This is getting serious and no number of candles, vigils and little french flags on your Facebook profiles is going to help. Only knowledge of who and what is behind all of this is going to help. I don’t go looking for this stuff but time and time again, Israeli/jews happen to be right in the thick of it and that footage was deliberate! 

Two movies due/jew for release which were canned because of two terrorist attacks around their release dates. HOW MUCH “COINCIDENCE” CAN YOU TAKE?

A young con artist and former CIA agent embark on an anti-terrorist mission in France.
Studiocanal Asks French Theaters to Pull ‘Bastille Day’ Movie in Wake of Nice Attack (EXCLUSIVE)

A freelance journalist (Malik Zidi) investigates the growing phenomenon of disaffected youth joining Islamic extremist groups. He infiltrates a group of four young jihadis whose mission is to destabilize the city center of Paris.
https://www.theguardian.com/film/2015/nov/16/film-french-terror-cell-called-off-paris-attacks-made-in-france
Here’s another couple of simple common sense issues to work your mind around. By all means ignore them or, alternatively, come up with some logical explanation and I’m VERY happy to listen.

1. Many people have already questioned the fact the truck had no blood on it. Indeed, such a thought is ridiculous but, certainly, if you think otherwise then go ahead. 
2. Have a good think about this photo. We see a heap of people, just mowed over by a truck which sped up, we’re told, and ploughs through them, perhaps knocking a few to the side but these ones are all lying there in the middle of the road. What do you notice (or not in fact)?
   Blood! There is not a hint of blood spattering anywhere on that road around a whole group of people having been hit by this truck. Not only that but, if these people were hit and then run across by the truck (which would have to be the case) there would be dismembered bodies cut in half and the rest. There isn’t. All the bodies appear completely intact. This just simply does not compute.
   
   
   

   “By way of deception, thou shalt do war”